Policy

1st February 2012
Richard Mabey & Tony Lodge

This new report from the Bow Group Transport and Energy Committee, Winning the consensus on High Speed Rail: why all parties should now support the best route for HS2,

21st January 2012

-The Argentine government has demanded renewed talks about the islands, which Argentina calls Las Malvinas. ¿Is this a provocation or the right decision?


The issue of the ownership of the Falkland Islands is one that has been resolved in bitter conflict, therefore the Argentine people clearly continue to feel dispossessed. The recent growth of the Argentine economy, and the the discovery of oil within the Falklands territory has given the debate renewed vigour in Argentina. We are, however, not in the era of Western history when governance of a land is decided by autocratic means, it is decided by the will of the people. It is therefore a decision of the people of the Falkland Islands as to who should govern them and under which nationality they should fall. It is apparent that they wish to remain a British territory.
4th January 2012

Writing at the commentator.com Bow Group Chairman Ben Harris Quinney puts forward the case that the recent immolation by press and commentary of Aiden Burley MP is yet another example of the media gripping a story, and with wilfully blinkered vision tearing someone’s career, and life, apart without asking any of the difficult questions that should come with proposing a universal and immutable moral compass.

In such circumstance it seems the person concerned loses the ability to reason with the current of media criticism and merely offers a grovelling and often unconvincing apology, usually with the political party or company’s head of media looming in the background.

I have never been to a party that featured anyone in Nazi dress, but if I had, I probably would not have left. It would be quite a different matter if someone, in any dress, began to espouse openly murderous, anti British, American or anti-Semitic views. But dressing up in something or as something bizarre and taboo for the purpose of merriment does not necessarily imply synergy or sympathy with the subject.

19th December 2011
Ben Harris-Quinney

 

I recall working with the former Spanish President Jose Maria Aznar when he made the statement that Europe was founded on the basis of a Judea-Christian heritage, and that this formed a significant part of the common bond between nations of Europe and the West.

In the speech President Aznar did not go so far as to directly comment that the Christian doctrine was a positive thing, and yet he was greeted with great controversy and criticism in making the statement, despite its relatively uncontroversial grounding in historical fact.

In his Oxford speech David Cameron not only referenced the part Christianity has played in our shared Island history, but made reference to the positive and valuable nature of the Christian doctrine and faith in society, in so doing he moved wilfully from historical fact to personal interpretation.

14th December 2011

Writing on Conservative Home the Chairman of the Bow Group argues that young Conservatives should be deeply concerned by the nation’s economic future and position in the world, and seek to make their voice heard.

The people for whom low growth, increasing government debt, and high unemployment, should be the most sobering news are those who most often exhibit the least concern, and have the smallest voice when policy is being made.

Young people in Britain, more than any other demographic, should be deeply concerned by the nation’s economic future and position in the world.

11th December 2011

Bow Group Chairman answers questions in leading European newspaper La Razon on David Cameron's EU veto.

1st December 2011
Ben Harris-Quinney

The victory of the Partido Popular in the 20N Spanish general elections is good news for Spain, good news for Europe and good news for the UK......in theory. The Spanish economy needs emergency attention from responsible government

29th November 2011
Raheem Kassam

 

You must remember. The fanfare, the fist pumping, the feeling that ‘things can only get better’. No, this wasn’t 1997, this was 2009.

Gordon Brown had bottled a General Election and the Tories were riding the crest of a wave. Women supported them, youngsters supported them and environmental activists were thinking of ‘voting blue and going green’.

One other flagship policy from the Tories, designed to win over the direct democrats and libertarians, was that of open primaries, a system commonly used in the United States whereby the local residents, not just party members, get to choose their candidates for their constituencies, rather than having party pole-climbers parachuted in.

“Great!” We thought. We can fully support this: a system that delivers talented representatives and in some cases,whistle-blowers for bad behavior. The opposition ostensibly followed suit.

Alas now in government, the Tories seem to have put all this democracy nonsense behind them. Well, unless you’re Libyan.

21st November 2011
Ben Harris-Quinney

 

After 7 years of government the PSOE have been swept from power in Spain, but the greatest challenge for the opposition Partido Popular, perhaps in the history of the party, has only begun.

Mariano Rajoy begins the Presidency facing the record unemployment and debt that has been a feature of the Spanish economy for some years now, but also a recent rise in borrowing costs that served as the final tipping point to push the Greek and Italian economies into terminal status.

There will be no time to delay in implementing the economic plan that Spain will rely on to save itself. The lesson from the Coalition government in the UK of swift and determined application of a comprehensive programme of cuts will prove a highly relevant model for Spain.

There is much to suggest that the experience and character of President Rajoy and his government is well suited to the challenge, where Rajoy will struggle is finding his voice on the international stage which is increasingly crowded by strong voices keen to influence the future of the eurozone and global economy.

16th November 2011
Benjamin Harris-Quinney

Remembrance weekend is always a time where the issues faced by our service men and women come to the forefront of political debate.

This year’s remembrance day also marks a significant year for the future of our armed forces, and a crossroads from where the structure and relationship in the UK between the people, the military and the government will undergo significant change.

The last year has seen the implementation of the Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR) and concurrently significant austerity measures applied to the armed forces. The most enduring process of change that will have begun in 2011 is the proposal being carried forward to enshrine the military covenant into law. 

The Prime Minister, supported by his government, has been ever ready in robust praise and vocal support for the armed forces, That support however has not yet translated into action.

It is crucial that the British public and members of our armed forces make abundantly clear to our government exactly what is expected with regard to provision of resources and care in the enshrining of the military covenant into law.